Cited by 945Fire effects on ecosystemsForest Management and PolicyRangeland and Wildlife Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION OF SOUTHWESTERN PONDEROSA PINE ECOSYSTEMS: A BROAD PERSPECTIVE

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to promote a broad and flexible perspective on ecological restoration of Southwestern (U.S.) ponderosa pine forests. Ponderosa pine forests in the region have been radically altered by Euro-American land uses, including livestock grazing, fire suppression, and logging. Dense thickets of young trees now abound, old-growth and biodiversity have declined, and human and ecological communities are increasingly vulnerable to destructive crown fires. A consensus has emerged that it is urgent to restore more natural conditions to these forests. Efforts to restore Southwestern forests will require extensive projects employing varying combinations of young-tree thinning and reintroduction of low-intensity fires. Treatments must be flexible enough to recognize and accommodate: high levels of natural heterogeneity; dynamic ecosystems; wildlife and other biodiversity considerations; scientific uncertainty; and the challenges of on-the-ground implementation. Ecological restoration should reset ecosystem trends toward an envelope of “natural variability,” including the reestablishment of natural processes. Reconstructed historic reference conditions are best used as general guides rather than rigid restoration prescriptions. In the long term, the best way to align forest conditions to track ongoing climate changes is to restore fire, which naturally correlates with current climate. Some stands need substantial structural manipulation (thinning) before fire can safely be reintroduced. In other areas, such as large wilderness and roadless areas, fire alone may suffice as the main tool of ecological restoration, recreating the natural interaction of structure and process. Impatience, overreaction to crown fire risks, extractive economics, or hubris could lead to widespread application of highly intrusive treatments that may further damage forest ecosystems. Investments in research and monitoring of restoration treatments are essential to refine restoration methods. We support the development and implementation of a diverse range of scientifically viable restoration approaches in these forests, suggest principles for ecologically sound restoration that immediately reduce crown fire risk and incrementally return natural variability and resilience to Southwestern forests, and present ecological perspectives on several forest restoration approaches.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[1418:erospp]2.0.co;2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00116-4 · DOI
  2. 10.1073/pnas.95.25.14839 · DOI
  3. 10.1139/cjfr-31-7-1205 · DOI
  4. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.95405.x · DOI
  5. 10.2307/2269493 · DOI
  6. 10.1023/A:1008137005355 · DOI
  7. 10.2307/1948549 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/35041641 · DOI
  9. 10.1300/J091v02n01_02 · DOI
  10. W. W. Covington, P. Z. Fule, M. M. Moore, S. C. Hart, T. E. Kolb, J. N. Mast, S. S. Sackett, and M. R. Wagner .1997 .Restoring ecosystem health in ponderosa pine forests of the Southwest .Journal of Forestry,95:23 -29 .
  11. W. W. Covington, and M. M. Moore .1994 .Southwestern ponderosa pine forest structure: changes since Euro-American settlement .Journal of Forestry,92:39 -47 .
  12. 10.2307/3236610 · DOI
  13. 10.1126/science.289.5477.270 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03991-6 · DOI
  15. 10.1029/WR025i009p01999 · DOI
  16. M. A. Finney, 2001 .Design of regular landscape fuel treatment patterns for modifying fire growth and behavior .Forest Science,47:219 -228 . · DOI
  17. 10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0895:DRCFEM]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  18. P. Z. Fule, A. E. M. Waltz, W. W. Covington, and T. A. Heinlein .2001 .Measuring forest restoration effectiveness in reducing hazardous fuels .Journal of Forestry,99, 11, 24 -29 .
  19. 10.1191/095968300668451235 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/0016-7061(81)90008-2 · DOI
  21. 10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[1052:ERANTI]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  22. P. L. Kennedy, 1997 .The Northern Goshawk (Accipter gentilis atricapillus): Is there evidence of a population decline? Journal of Raptor Research,31:95 -106 .
  23. 10.1126/science.287.5453.573 · DOI
  24. 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[1179:OOTUON]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  25. 10.2307/3545518 · DOI
  26. 10.1126/science.289.5484.1448b · DOI
  27. 10.2307/1937186 · DOI
  28. 10.1029/1999GL900070 · DOI
  29. 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0228:ROPASO]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  30. 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[1207:TROCCI]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  31. 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0085:MTEOFM]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  32. W. H. Moir, and J. H. Dieterich .1988 .Old-growth ponderosa pine from succession in pine-bunchgrass forests in Arizona and New Mexico .Natural Areas Journal,8:17 -24 .
  33. 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[1266:RCAERA]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  34. 10.1300/J091v02n01_04 · DOI
  35. 10.1071/WF01032 · DOI
  36. 10.1300/J091v06n03_05 · DOI
  37. 10.1139/x91-209 · DOI
  38. 10.1577/1548-8446(1997)022<0006:WANFIO>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  39. 10.2307/1369714 · DOI
  40. 10.2307/1932728 · DOI
  41. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96198.x · DOI
  42. 10.1007/BF01867172 · DOI
  43. 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[1253:RCFGSF]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  44. 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[1189:AHEUTP]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  45. 10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<3128:MDAERT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00114-0 · DOI
  47. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99084.x · DOI · Paper page
  48. M. R. Wagner, W. M. Block, B. W. Geils, and K. F. Wenger .2000 .Restoration ecology: A new forest management paradigm or another merit badge for foresters? Journal of Forestry,98:22 -27 .
  49. H. Weaver, 1951 .Fire as an ecological factor in Southwestern ponderosa pine forests .Journal of Forestry,49:93 -98 .
  50. 10.2307/1940407 · DOI
  51. 10.1007/BF02059813 · DOI
  52. 10.1046/j.1526-100X.1997.00547.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 945

Metadata

Authors
Allen, C. D., Savage, M., Falk, D. A., Suckling, K. F., Swetnam, T. W., Schulke, T., Stacey, P. B., Morgan, P., Hoffman, M., & Klingel, J. T.
Affiliations
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • University of Idaho (US)
  • New Mexico Department of Game and Fish (US)
Corresponding author
Allen, Craig D.
Venue
Ecological Applications
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-10
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
1418-1433
ISSN
1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2152617724
Cited by
945
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 44
FWCI
24.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecological Applications (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Management and Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
ponderosa pine forests, ecological restoration, fire reintroduction, fire suppression, livestock grazing, logging, biodiversity, natural variation, forest resilience, restoration principles, restoration monitoring, southwestern United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review